Hi Shaun,
Le 30 sept. 08 à 12:45, Shaun McDonald a écrit :
If you use that branch, how are we going to get this fix into 2.4.2? Exactly which fixes will be going in? Is it the function change that I mentioned on my blog?
Yes, DEV300 is probably a bad idea, but I think I still can change (the cws is only at planned state), or ask Martin to backport the fix (shouldn't be too problematic)
Kind regards, Eric -- qɔᴉɹə
