If you were going for the photos very regularly, I would recommend the higher priced ones (these start at around $300). I am thinking more in terms of crisp b&w output for articles etc. and sharp graphics output (charts, etc).
BTW, check out today's PCWeenies cartoon, it's you! (grin) http://www.pcweenies.com/ Jerry On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 05:02 PM, Bill Rising wrote: > On 3/11/03 16:10, Jerry Yeager wrote > >> It depends on your budget. Both Epson and Canon have recently released >> new printers for regular use (very high resolution) for under $300. >> > > Well - if the difference between the ~$125 printer and the ~$275 > printer > is better photo printing, I wouldn't think that the extra money was > worth > it (after all, it more than doubles the price of the printer). If the > bigger price tag comes with a much much faster printer with other > non-photo related niceties, then the fancier printer might be good. > > I'm hedging on the photo printing, 'cuz even if I had a digital camera, > I'd doubt that I would print the pictures very often. > > Bill > > > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will > | be March 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. > > > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will | be March 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
