On Aug 9, 2006, at 3:16 PM, Jane Blake Acree asked:

> Have to wonder about this third-party wireless card they used.
>
> What do you think, Lee?

A lot of third-party drivers are buggy. It's unfortunate in this case  
that the headlines made it sound like an Apple problem. Apple is  
asking for such coverage with the hubris shown in its Mac dude versus  
Windows dork ad campaign.

Here's the way a lot of the third-party drivers for devices get written:

Company A makes a new whatzit gadget based on a new whatzit chip from  
Company B. Company C knows there will be many companies making  
whatzits based on the chips from Company B, so they write a generic  
driver program for the chip and sell customized versions of it to  
Compaany A and Company A's competitors. This could mean almost every  
whatzit out there is using the code from Company C.

Now, suppose there's a bug in the whatzit code from Company C, or the  
chip from Company B has a weakness. An exploit may work on most  
whatzits.

This exact thing happened last year to companies using BroadComm  
Ethernet controller chips and some years before that to Intel on its  
original EEPRo100 Ethernet cards.





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2398 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://www.math.louisville.edu/pipermail/macgroup/attachments/20060809/770c688c/attachment.bin
 

Reply via email to