Your right Jonathan, I should have never doubted you.  I believe I'll take the 
day off tomorrow for penitence.  

I still want to know WHY the price of the G10 is going through the roof?  My 
used Canon was worth $50.00 and I had paid over $400.00 for it, these G10s are 
SELLING for close to $500.00 on eBay as used and going for over $900.00 new.  
Why?

John

By the way, I still don't doubt you, I am doing a research paper on peoples 
answers to tough questions so you are helping tremendously.




On Jun 27, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Jonathan Fletcher wrote:

> On Jun 27, 2010, at 10:44 PM,  John Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> See, you know what you are talking about!  
> 
> I'm shocked! I say SHOCKED that you would even consider otherwise!
> 
> ::-)
> 
>> I just can't figure out if the G11 is so much better why the new G10's are 
>> close to $1,000.00 and used ones are bringing close to $500.00?  Why do they 
>> not buy the G11?
> 
> Some people still think more megapixels means more better. Problem is that 
> there are other things to consider, too.
> 
>> 
>> I also am so dumb at this I need you to explain. IF the the sensor is about 
>> the same size but the fewer pixels allow more light then why not choke it 
>> down to 2 or 3 on the mp?
> 
> John, I never thought of you as speechless! 
> 
> Well, to a certain extent more megapixels means greater POTENTIAL quality. 
> But when you have a really tiny sensor and cram so many pixels onto it you 
> have to give up something. In this case the G10 can't shoot for beans in low 
> light. (Believe me, I've tried.) Canon answered the bevy of complaints about 
> the G10 with bigger pixels. A bigger sensor definitely WOULD have put it 
> closer to their pro SLRs, so they went with bigger, but fewer, pixels. Still, 
> the G11 still cannot compete with the awesome light-catchers in the pro SLR 
> offerings of Canons and Nikons of the world. But it's not designed for that. 
> 
> Tradeoffs have existed in photography since before Kodak started making 
> cameras that took that new-fangled film-on-a-roll, or the first guy who 
> re-spooled 35mm movie film to put in a still camera. Do you want to carry 
> around an IMAX camera or a Flip Mino (or better yet an iPhone!). 
> 
> The answer is, as always, "It depends."
> 
> ::-)
> 
> 
> --
> Jonathan Fletcher
> FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer
> 
> Fletcher Data Consulting
> [email protected]
> http://www.fletcherdata.com
> 502-509-7137
> 
> 
> Kentuckiana's Only FileMaker Users Group:
> Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
> Blog: http://kyfmp.com
> Next meeting: 
> 7/15/10 1:00 pm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MacGroup mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.math.louisville.edu/mailman/listinfo/macgroup
> 




_______________________________________________
MacGroup mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.math.louisville.edu/mailman/listinfo/macgroup

Reply via email to