I'm all for changing the license to GNU General Public License v3 for the reasons that Matt has stated. I think promoting the growth of the Mach-II framework is a fantastic idea and definitely a step in the right direction. I can't see this impacting anybody unless, like Joseph has said, people are distributing modified versions of Mach-II.
I can totally see Mach-II turn into a pretty rad 'core' piece of software with a vast repository of supporting modules. Adrian. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to Mach-II for CFML list. To post to this group, send email to mach-ii-for-coldfusion@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mach-ii-for-coldfusion-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mach-ii-for-coldfusion?hl=en SVN: http://greatbiztoolsllc.svn.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ Wiki / Documentation / Tickets: http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
