Oooh, right on. Sorry, I guess this was a case of RTFM. :P On Mar 31, 8:00 pm, "Peter J. Farrell" <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian, You should look at URL Routes in Mach-II 1.8. Routes should > satisfy a majority of SEO / SES urls. > > .pjf > > Brian Pickens said the following on 31/03/10 15:35: > > > > > I'm curious, how many out there resort to using other methods to > > satisfy your seo requirements, and end up not using buildUrl, but > > having to create your own urls? > > > On Mar 31, 3:33 pm, Brian Pickens<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hey I thinking it could be a useful feature to add to MachII, to be > >> able to extend the buildUrl tools. Something that could allow us to > >> determine the rules that build our urls? For the next iteration of our > >> cms, I'm looking at modifying the BuildUrl functions in order to fit > >> the seo requirements of our cms. I was just thinking that it would be > >> cool to make this extensible the same as most of the rest of the > >> framework features are.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to Mach-II for CFML list. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mach-ii-for-coldfusion?hl=en SVN: http://greatbiztoolsllc.svn.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ Wiki / Documentation / Tickets: http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/
