OK If you would like to 'donate' the driver, I can add it to the repo and it will get built properly, automatically at any rebuild, Just tested and root@INTEL-i7:/usr/src/machinekit# DEBUG=5 realtime restart root@INTEL-i7:/usr/src/machinekit# halcmd loadrt hal_p260c <commandline>:0: Realtime module 'hal_p260c' loaded root@INTEL-i7:/usr/src/machinekit# halcmd show pin Component Pins: Comp Inst Type Dir Value Name Epsilon Flags linked to: 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-01-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-01-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-02-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-02-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-03-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-03-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-04-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-04-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-05-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-05-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-06-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-06-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-07-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-07-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-08-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-08-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-09-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-09-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-10-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-10-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-11-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-11-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-12-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-12-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-13-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-13-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-14-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-14-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-15-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-15-out --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-16-in --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.0.pin-16-out --l- 78 s32 IN 0 hal_p260c.0.rx_cnt_error --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.rx_comm_error --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.0.rx_perm_error --l- 78 s32 OUT 0 hal_p260c.refresh.time ---- 78 s32 I/O 0 hal_p260c.refresh.tmax ---- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.refresh.tmax-inc ---- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.rx_comm_error --l- 78 bit OUT FALSE hal_p260c.rx_perm_error --l- 78 bit IN FALSE hal_p260c.rx_reset_error --l- 78 s32 IN 0 hal_p260c.sys_max_read --l- 78 s32 IN 0 hal_p260c.sys_max_write --l- 78 s32 IN 0 hal_p260c.sys_writecnt --l- I suspect you may have been trying to use the old module and not re-built to account for linkage relocations, this will solve it in future. regards On 24/02/17 14:20,
schoone...@btinternet.com wrote:
I missed the attachments - apologies -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to machinekit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: M... schoone...@btinternet.com
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit mul... schoone...@btinternet.com
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit multico... Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit mul... Charles Steinkuehler
- [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit multicore merge Daniel Skrlin
- [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit multicore merge Daniel Skrlin
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit multico... schoone...@btinternet.com
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit mul... Daniel Skrlin
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: Machinekit... Daniel Skrlin
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: Machi... schoone...@btinternet.com
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: M... schoone...@btinternet.com
- Re: [Machinekit] Re: M... Daniel Skrlin