On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 09:42 AM, Chris Nandor wrote:
> I wonder if maybe we should have Carbon:: or Cocoa:: namespaces? Even > Mac::Carbon:: or Mac::Cocoa:: or Mac::Aqua:: etc. This would be > Mac::Carbon::Something in that case ... I haven't weighed in on this issue (or much of anything of late) but this would seem to be the most reasonable solution. This would give us Mac:: as the "classic" MacOS namespace, Mac::Carbon:: as the transitional API (with CarbonLib on MacOS 9 and earlier systems), and Mac::Cocoa as the namespace for MacOS X (and later) modules. Although I would still push for similar interfaces across similar modules (and there will be some duplicate functionality regardless of what else happens). --B
