On Jan 23, 2007, at 17:52, Mark Duling wrote:
Port gd2 is at 2.0.33. If gd 1.x is no longer needed couldn't we just
delete it and use the gd2 port?
Aaaa! Yes, why was r21414 committed? I would have thought the point
of having a gd and a gd2 port was to keep the 1.x and 2.x series
separate.
There may be some cases where programs that worked with gd1 won't
work with gd2, according to the gd faq:
http://libgd.org/FAQ#Why_doesn.
27t_my_gd_1.x_program_work_well_with_gd_2.x.3F
How do we discover which ports, if any, depend on gd? "port echo
depends_lib:gd" does not seem to work (produces an error).
[email protected] on Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at
3:36 PM
-0800 wrote:
Revision
[ http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/21414 ]21414
Author
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date
2007-01-23 15:36:22 -0800 (Tue, 23 Jan 2007)
Log Message
gd 2.0.33
Modified Paths
[
fcp://@bubbs.biola.edu,%235000280/MailBox/%
23196897907#trunkdportsgraphicsgdPortfile
]trunk/dports/graphics/gd/Portfile
Diff
Modified: trunk/dports/graphics/gd/Portfile (21413 => 21414)
--- trunk/dports/graphics/gd/Portfile 2007-01-23 23:22:13 UTC (rev
21413)
+++ trunk/dports/graphics/gd/Portfile 2007-01-23 23:36:22 UTC (rev
21414)
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
PortSystem 1.0
name gd
-version 1.8.4
-set libver 1.8
-revision 3
+version 2.0.33
+set libver 2.0.0
+revision 4
categories graphics
maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
description GD creates PNG and JPEG images, among other formats
@@ -19,17 +19,11 @@
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
