are you saying we need additional ports like readline50 readline 51
readline 52?
Regards,
Elias
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-03-19 21:37:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 22947
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/
22947
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-03-19 21:37:19 -0700 (Mon, 19 Mar 2007)
Log Message:
-----------
* bump version to 5.2
* add links for 5.[01]'s libs (should fix #9897, #9335, please
confirm)
I'm not sure that this is correct. If the library name has changed,
this normally mean that the API is not backward compatible, in which
case adding symlinks would be incorrect.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/
blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-
Lyon)
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
