On Apr 14, 2007, at 22:04, Paul Guyot wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 22:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: trunk/base/doc/portfile.7 (23967 => 23968)
--- trunk/base/doc/portfile.7 2007-04-14 01:54:40 UTC (rev 23967)
+++ trunk/base/doc/portfile.7 2007-04-14 03:34:33 UTC (rev 23968)
@@ -1331,6 +1331,26 @@
.br
.Sy Example:
.Dl default_variants +ssl +tcpd
+.It Ic unversal_variant
+When using MacPorts on MacOS X, a universal variant is defined and
+the default behavior is to configure ports with universal flags
Wait... I thought the default behavior was for the +universal
variant to be available to all ports, but that you had to select
it if you wanted to use it.
This is what I meant, or at least tried to express. +universal will
be available to all ports unless they specify "universal_variant
no". And universal variant code will have no effect (except listing
this variant as available) unless users select +universal. The
default behavior *of the universal variant* is to configure with
universal flags.
Please feel free to correct the wording to make the man page easier
to understand.
I see what you meant now. :)
So, these changes you're making... are they the solution to the
problem I reported when I want to define my own universal variant?
Should I be (as soon as released MacPorts supports it) using
"universal_variant no" before defining my own universal variant?
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
