[from the correct e-mail address, this time] On Jul 22, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:You may also wish to check for compatible architecture in a differentway. Your way currently handles only on Intel Mac OS X, but according tothe project's web site, it works on any OS so long as it's the _86architecture. Consider doing it the way I've done it in the wine port:http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/browser/trunk/dports/ x11/wine/PortfileI see no reason why checking for darwin i386 could be wrong. Do we really need to take care of other Operating Systems than Mac OS X? Imean, it's called MacPorts now and is targeted on users of Mac OS X. Whois using it on another system?
That's no reason to -intentionally- box yourself (or others) into a corner. The requirement is for 'x86', not for darwin, and as such, expressing a much broader dependency is incorrect.
-landonf
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
