Anders F Björklund wrote:
For MacPorts 1.6.0,
I think you should split the "dports" trunk in two,
"trunk" and "release", just as done with the "base".
There is just too much port breakage with running the
latest developer version on the user machines, IMHO.
I second that.
Or perhaps a bit a more elaborate scheme like fink uses it: namely a
stable and an unstable tree.
Would make things much more reliable.
It also needs a cooler name... Such as "Evolution",
as in: I'm running the latest MacPorts Evolution. :-)
If people want fancy names...
--anders
Michael
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
