On 10.12.2007, at 18:27, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 08:43, Weissmann Markus wrote:
On 10.12.2007, at 15:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 08:16, Weissmann Markus wrote:
Hmmm... wouldn't it be much cleaner and easier to only have one
variant "quartz" as "quartz" and "x11" are mutually exclusive
anyway?
Since there is a choice to be made for x11 support or quartz
support, I think it makes sense to list both of these as variants.
The port should (and now does) ensure that exactly one of these is
selected at all times.
well, I prefer to not making this a philosophical problem:
With one variant, you get two different installations, with two
variants, you get four. In this case (gtk2), two of the four variants
are "errors" and are then fixed (with the defaults variant) or with a
user warning. I think it would be better to eliminate the problem
altogether then trying to fix it's effects.
This way it wouldn't be necessary to explain to a user why the
selection "x11 and quartz" he just made is illegal.
I didn't think they were mutually exclusive?
"\n\nThe gtk2 port can be built and installed with support for
either Quartz\n(Aqua) rendering or X11 rendering, but not both.\n
\n" [1]
[1] https://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/browser/trunk/
dports/x11/gtk2/Portfile?rev=31844
Oh hey, so it is. I marked the +x11 and +quartz variants as
conflicting with one another in r31870. That should do it.
s.o.
Regards,
-Markus
---
Dipl. Inf. (FH) Markus W. Weissmann
http://www.mweissmann.de/
http://www.macports.org/
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
