If the developer call it as stable and the other's development, Let' follow it. Anyone who like to use newer can easily choose -devel one.
On Feb 7, 2008 10:50 PM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-02-07 22:08:57 +0900, js wrote: > > I agree with you, > > but I think that the situation that devel-ver < stable-ver is very > > rare. I've never seen it. (By newer, you means the version number is > > greater, right?) > > It happens for tin almost each time a new stable version is released > (because it is released before new development work starts). The same > thing seems to happen with zsh: > > http://zsh.dotsrc.org/News/ > > 4.2.0 (stable) was released on 2004-03-19, a 4.3 (unstable) series was > announced on 2005-02-08, and the first 4.3-based version (4.3.1) was > released on 2006-02-28. So, for almost two years, the latest version > (in term of features and bug fixes) was a stable release! > > -- > Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> > 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> > Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) > _______________________________________________ > > macports-dev mailing list > macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev > _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
