On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:13:47PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard said: > Another interesting point about the default universal arches is that > today, they're set to "i386 ppc" whereas "the future" would tend to > suggest that "i386 x86_64" will be a better choice, so at some point the > defaults are also going to have to change. Is this a knob that we > currently support setting on a site-specific basis?
universal_archs in etc/macports/macports.conf is probably what you're looking for; setting to 'i386 x86_64' and building +universal does work, for at least those ports that can build 64bit. Bryan > > - Jordan > > On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > >> I have a need of more 32/64-bit universal packages. >> To facilitate this, I would like to propose a PortGroup with a >> different >> universal build mechanism than the default. >> See http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17972. >> >> It is intended to be an improvement of the merge function. >> >> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. >> The only time I write in Tcl is on MacPorts related projects. >> >> -Marcus >> _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
