Blair Zajac wrote: > Blair Zajac wrote: >> Rainer Müller wrote: >>> As far as I know the only advantage of the frameworks is currently to >>> have working pythonw and IDLE. Is there really no way to get this >>> without a framework build or did just nobody try yet? >> The Ice Python bindings requires a framework build. Sony Pictures >> Imageworks whole middle-tier infrastructure is based on Ice with Python >> clients.
I looked through the configure scripts in ice-python26 and did not find anything special regarding framework installations. Is that your own experience or is it documented somewhere? I also cannot find any information on the website. > Oh, and doesn't PyQt require a framework install? We depend heavily on that > too. I looked around and the only reference I found is this: <http://diotavelli.net/PyQtWiki/Mac_OS_X_Installation_Notes> We have seen this error a lot and it usually happens when linking against the wrong python version, e.g. mixing headers and libraries. Yet again its configure.py demonstrate how linking against python should not be done: if sys.platform == "darwin": # We need to work out how to specify the right framework # version. link = "-framework Python" At least it looks like they are aware that this has issues :-) And somehow it still seems to link correct, so I am not investigating this any further. Other than this conditional in the configuration I did not see anything special requiring a python framework. Note that I did not actually try to build these ports against a non-framework python, just looking at their configure scripts. Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev