On Jun 4, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Duplication will have to happen on name, desc, long desc, I
assume? Version probably does not matter in any strict sense, as
it is not really downloading anything?
Right
So with +server and +clamav_milter what do you do? I am now seeing
the need for these ports:
clamav - base port, gets you cpam
clamav-server - depends on clamav but installs a startup item
clamav-clamav_milter - depends on clamav, but installs clamav_milter
clamav-server-milter - depends on clamav, gets you milter and the
startup item
I need some guidance here, I am seeing this very quickly getting
out of hand where there are ports with more than one variant.
The variants used descend through the dependency tree: If you
install +milter on clamav-server, +milter will get used on clamav.
At least, this is what I believe: Try it and find out.
If I need assp to depend on clam, and clam to have +server and
+clam_av_milter, what do you suggest? * I do not need milter at
this time, just wondering.
I am leaning on just not including the clamav as a variant for
assp, but it is so logical to have it at the same time.
This should all follow from using the variants in the server port.
I am not sure i understand this:
port install assp
Within that port, assp will depend on clamav, but since I can not
define a variant for clamav +server, I have to make a clamav-server
port. Fine up to that point.
Now, what is I want clamav +server +clamav_milter available to the
assp port?
My port install command would be port install assp still, there would
still be a call in there to clamav-server, where does the milter go in?
Thanks
--
Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ *
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev