On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:26, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:19:38AM +0000, Eric Hall wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:57:53PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:46:57PM +0000, Eric Hall wrote: >> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:38:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> > > > There is hope! We have an analysis of the exact >> > > > breakage in eh under 10.6 for gcc trunk... >> > > > >> > > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025908.html >> > > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025909.html >> > > > >> > > > The breakage in gcc trunk is due to the additional epilog unwind >> > > > information which darwin's unwinder (which is always used under >> > > > 10.6 since symbols in libgcc-10.5 always come from libSystem) >> > > > doesn't understand. The possible fixes are either to 1) not add >> > > > the additional epilog unwind information on darwin or 2) have >> > > > the gcc driver on darwin implicitly pass -no_compact_unwind to >> > > > the link line. Cheers. >> > > > Jack >> > > >> > > >> > > Did someone care somewhere in here? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > macports-dev mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> > > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev >> > >> > If anyone here cares whether gcc 4.5.0 exists in a usable form >> > on darwin10, I should hope so. These were courtesy emails for >> > the gcc44 maintainers here to let the know that someone is >> > working the issue. If darwin support for gcc isn't tended to >> > you'll eventually stuck running g95 (oh..wait...g95 doesn't >> > build on darwin10...never mind). >> >> >> Huh, funny, this 'Xcode' thingy installs a compiler, >> seems like it works too. I'm thinking that sort of thing >> is going to continue in the future. >> Is there a reason there's ongoing discussion of >> gcc 4.x on a macports related list instead of on a gcc >> list? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> macports-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev > > Gee, I must be missing something from my SL Xcode > installation....where is the fortran *thingy*? > Jack > ps No one is forcing you to read the posts.
Given current reality, you're probably better off contributing to llvm-gfortran... or better yet, a native fortran front-end for llvm. FSF gcc is barely relevant on our platform these days. - Toby _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
