On Nov 11, 2009, at 08:43, [email protected] wrote:
Revision: 60409
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/60409
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-11-11 06:43:08 -0800 (Wed, 11 Nov 2009)
Log Message:
-----------
upgrade to 4.6.0-beta1 based on current qt4-mac port
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/dports/aqua/qt4-mac-devel/Portfile
Modified: trunk/dports/aqua/qt4-mac-devel/Portfile
===================================================================
--- trunk/dports/aqua/qt4-mac-devel/Portfile 2009-11-11 14:42:35 UTC
(rev 60408)
+++ trunk/dports/aqua/qt4-mac-devel/Portfile 2009-11-11 14:43:08 UTC
(rev 60409)
@@ -5,23 +5,23 @@
name qt4-mac-devel
conflicts qt4-mac
-version 4.5.0
-revision 1
+version 4.6.0-beta1
categories aqua
platforms macosx
-maintainers illogic-al openmaintainer
+maintainers nomaintainer
Is Orville OK with losing maintainership of this port? qt4-mac was
declared abandoned via #22052, but that was maintained by someone else.
It would be ideal if a single maintainer (or maintainers) who knows
about Qt would take over all the Qt ports (qt4-mac, qt4-x11, qt4-mac-
devel, qt4-kde, qt3, qt3-mac).
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
