On Dec 17, 2009, at 02:20, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Dec 17, 2009, at 01:26, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> >>> Should I bother submitting dovecot sieve and if so what should I name it? >> >> Maybe dovecot-sieve? There is an open request to add a +sieve variant to >> dovecot; maybe your separate port would satisfy this request. A separate >> port is probably better for usability than a variant anyway. >> >> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/11810 > > There are two sieve options for dovecot, Dovecot Sieve for Dovecot 1.2 and > newer and CMU Sieve for Dovecot 1.0 through 1.2. > > So dovecot-sieve and later if someone wants the other they could create > dovecot-cmu-sieve?
Oh, I see. Well that sounds ok. In any case it will be good to have any sieve option for dovecot in MacPorts. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
