On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:

> On 2010-01-11 10:49 , Jeremy Lainé wrote:
>> I am trying to work my way through issues reported against qt4, and one of 
>> the things which is making things a bit awkward is the fact that there are 
>> too many qt4-* ports.
>> 
>> Does anyone use qt4-kde (which is lagging behind qt4-mac) or can it safely 
>> be dropped?
> 
> There is actually no dependent. Only qtscriptgenerator has some code to
> either use qt4-kde or qt4-mac... Could easily be
> 
> I think this port was created back then there still existed some
> problems between qt4-kde and KDE 4. That seems to be resolved, so please
> let us drop it.

OK, say goodbye to qt4-kde! I have simplified the qtscriptgenerator Portfile 
accordingly.

Jeremy
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to