On 14 Jan 2010, at 02:58, Michael Crawford wrote: > The GPL is not just one license; in reality we have four licenses > whose terms and compatibilities are quite significantly different from > each other: > > GPL version 2 > GPL version 2 or any later version > GPL version 3 > GPL version 3 or any later version
Another approach would be to consider GPLv2+ code as dual licensed; that is, list the licences as: license GPL-2.0 GPL-3.0 Should a GPLv3.1 or GPLv4 ever appear, it can be added to the list on if/when needed. -- Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
