On Sep 9, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Raphael Straub wrote: > > I didn't know that for sure. So, before committing my changes, I tested the > new qt4_mac variant with a post-destroot block inside the variant, but the > post-destroot phase was not executed. Everything was OK after collecting all > post-destroot phases.
It's odd that it didn't work for you, I've done this in the past and it has worked fine. > In addition, the guide > <http://guide.macports.org/#development.variants.phase> explicitly says to > prefer variant_isset and provides a post-destroot phase as an example. There are at least a few of us that feel this is bad advice in the guide. Personally, I think variant_isset is often an indicator of something that is being done in a way that is much more complicated than necessary. -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- dl...@geeklair.net ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
