On 19 Sep 2010, at 00:30, Nick Ludlam wrote: > On 18 Sep 2010, at 21:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> Sure, the message could be expanded. A revised suggestion: >> >> >> ########################################################### >> # A launchd plist has been created to help you start and >> # stop the <port name> daemon. It is stopped by default. >> # >> # To start the <port name> daemon now and during every >> # subsequent system startup, run the following command: >> # >> # sudo port load <port name> >> # >> # To stop the <port name> daemon now and to prevent it >> # from from starting automatically during system startup, >> # run the following command: >> # >> # sudo port unload <port name> >> ########################################################### >> >> >> I feel adding "daemon" is important since a port might install both a client >> component and a server component, and the launchd plist would only apply to >> the server component. > > Yeah that looks fine. If this can be committed, I'll draw up a list of ports > that have related (and subsequently redundant) ui_msg statements that we can > remove
Just following up, was this considered to be a good thing? The discussion got somewhat diverted into the gsoc08-privileges minefield. Nick
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
