On Mar 3, 2011, at 5:58 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> That would be the opposite of the way that these works today, and I can't >> imagine wanting to go through all thousands of ports and switch this. > > If it makes things better, it's worth it.
... and just to note why I care: It would be useful at some point to be able to differentiate between ports that need a library or ports that need an executable binary that is provided by another port (think about library ABI changes). -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
