How challenging would it be to have "port contents" work on "installed" rather then "active"?
Example: $ port installed help2man The following ports are currently installed: help2man @1.38.4_0 help2man @1.39.2_0 (active) pillbox:pixilla brad$ $ port contents help2man@1.38.4_0 I'm trying to track down an issue where a dependency has been upgraded and a library path has changed. So I wrote a script to run otool on all the contents of a port and verify that paths exist. Well, I have the new software deactivated because it's broke so I would still like to use "port contents <port name>@<version>_<revision><+variants>". In the mean time I'll glob the dir at $prefix/var/software/<port name>/<version>... Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
