On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:36, dpo...@macports.org wrote:

> Revision: 81459
>          http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81459
> Author:   dpo...@macports.org
> Date:     2011-07-30 23:36:16 -0700 (Sat, 30 Jul 2011)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> fuse4x: install library as libfuse.dylib rather than
> libfuse4x.dylib. The port conflicts with macfuse anyway, so there's no
> need to keep them separate, and this will make it easier for dependent
> ports to find the library.


...until those ports start jumping on the fuse4x bandwagon and start looking 
for it by that name, right? :)


_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to