On Nov 2, 2011, at 06:08, usam...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 86730 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/86730 > Author: usam...@macports.org > Date: 2011-11-02 04:07:58 -0700 (Wed, 02 Nov 2011) > Log Message: > ----------- > add livecheck and license > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > trunk/dports/sysutils/rmtrash/Portfile > > Modified: trunk/dports/sysutils/rmtrash/Portfile > =================================================================== > --- trunk/dports/sysutils/rmtrash/Portfile 2011-11-02 09:15:56 UTC (rev > 86729) > +++ trunk/dports/sysutils/rmtrash/Portfile 2011-11-02 11:07:58 UTC (rev > 86730) > @@ -2,8 +2,9 @@ > PortSystem 1.0 > name rmtrash > version 0.3.3 > -revision 1 > +revision 2
Since this does not change the files that get installed by the port, there was no reason to force users to rebuild by increasing the revision. > maintainers usami-k > +license free "free" is not a license we're familiar with. See if any of the good_licenses listed here are applicable to this package: https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/base/portmgr/jobs/port_binary_distributable.tcl?rev=86197#L24 > @@ -13,6 +14,7 @@ > homepage http://www.nightproductions.net/ > master_sites http://www.nightproductions.net/downloads/ > distname ${name}_source > +livecheck.type moddate You can improve the livecheck by getting the actual version out of the web page. See attached patch.
rmtrash-livecheck.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev