On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 17:08, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since this did not change any files that the port installed, the revision 
> should not have been increased. Don't change it now but please keep this in 
> mind for future updates. Increasing the revision prompts users (when they run 
> "sudo port sync && port outdated") to upgrade (i.e. rebuild) the port. If 
> there's no change to the files the port installs, there's no reason for them 
> to rebuild it.

That I know, but consider the revision bump comes from an explicit
patch from the maintainer, I didn't check if  files had changed. Will
be more thorough.

-- 
Andrea
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to