On 2012-4-9 02:06 , Landon Fuller wrote: > > I think it should be noted that rev-upgrade isn't really optional > in the same way that 'upgrade outdated' is -- rev-upgrade is > detecting genuinely broken binaries and fixing them, > automatically. > > As an end user, I just want things to work. If port(1) > automatically fixes broken ports on my system, all the better. I > don't personally think adding additional steps to fixing otherwise > broken binaries is a better experience for users.
It's a little surprising and non-optimal if it always forces source-only mode though, even when the port with broken linking is outdated and simply upgrading (possibly using an archive) might fix it. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
