On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:41:14PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2012, at 14:48, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else finding that a clean install of MacPorts 2.1.0-rc2 from
> > the source tarball on 10.7.4 with Xcode 4.3.2 results in the installed
> > MacPorts building packages with llvm-gcc rather than clang?
>
> Can you give an example of such a port?
I was just rebuilding molmol (which uses gcc without a path in its Makefile).
The error messages issued were from llvm-gcc. I thought MacPorts under Xcode
4.3.2
should be defaulting instances of unpathed gcc to clang, no?
Jack
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
