On Jun 18, 2012, at 05:13, Craig Treleaven <ctrelea...@cogeco.ca> wrote:

> At 9:42 PM -0700 6/17/12, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> On Jun 17, 2012, at 10:18, Craig Treleaven <ctrelea...@cogeco.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>> At 9:27 AM -0700 6/17/12, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>>> Does mythtv -mysql_server require qt4-mac +mysql?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yes, mythtv-core.25 -mysql_server still needs mysql5 client and qt4-mac 
>>> +mysql.
>>> 
>>> The mysql_server variant to mythtv-core.25 is for those people who want to 
>>> install and run the MySQL database on the same machine, which is the most 
>>> common case.  I'm pretty sure I'm going to make it a default.
>> 
>> I don't think that the distinction is whether you want to run the MySQL 
>> database on the same machine.  That actually doesn't matter (or at least it 
>> dint' the last time I checked).  I think what you *want* to variant is if 
>> the port will install the mythtv backend...
>> 
> 
> Umm, no?  Myth is really set up to build and install _all_ its software (ie 
> frontend and backend);

That's why you would have a variant.  Users who just want the frontend, don't 
want to build and install the backend.

> it is up to the user to decide how they want to use that machine.

Yeah, and if I don't want to use this machine as a backend, why do I need to 
waste my time building it ;)

>  Years ago, there may have been some attempt to produce backend-only or 
> frontend-only configs.  The savings are miniscule and upstream strongly 
> discourages* that kind of packaging, now.

Ok, the last time I used MythTV was maybe 7 years ago, so I'll just take your 
word for it.

> Logically, Myth is one database server, one or more backends (one master and 
> n slave backends) and one or more frontends.  It is common to have those 
> three functions all on one machine.  You're right though that other configs 
> are OK.  Eg. Database server on one machine, master backend on another, slave 
> backends (connected to a TV tuner) or job queue-only (no tuner) slave 
> backends and a host of frontends.

Ok, well I still don't see why the mysql_server variant would be useful for.  
It doesn't really matter at build time where the database server is, right?



_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to