On 08/16/2012 05:47 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

On Aug 16, 2012, at 16:34, dl...@macports.org wrote:

Revision: 96665
          https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96665
Author:   dl...@macports.org
Date:     2012-08-16 14:34:33 -0700 (Thu, 16 Aug 2012)
Log Message:
-----------
subversion: version bump to 1.7.6 + patch to only build mod_dontdothat when 
building mod_dav_svn, and convert perlbindings port to use subports for each 
perl version (fixes #32694)

Would it maybe be appropriate to name the perl and python bindings ports to 
match how regular perl and python modules are named?


p5.8-subversionbindings
p5.10-subversionbindings
p5.12-subversionbindings
p5.14-subversionbindings
p5.16-subversionbindings
py24-subversionbindings
py25-subversionbindings
py26-subversionbindings
py27-subversionbindings

I was thinking we leave the subversion-python2?bindings alone, rename py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn because that's the real name of the package. In a year, rename subversion-python2?bindings to py2?-svn. Isn't the name of the package supposed to follow py2?-, even if it has 'py' in it?

I was going to do the py2?-svn to py2?-pysvn rename soon.

Blair

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to