On 2012-9-18 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Is "supported_archs noarch" and "+universal" mutually exclusive?
Yes, or at least it makes no sense to define a universal variant for a noarch port. > Should the automatic "+universal" variant be excluded by "supported_archs > noarch"? Yes, it is (for any supported_archs list with only one entry, in fact). - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
