On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 01:40:36PM -0600, Sean Farley wrote: > Hi all, > > I was writing to ask about adding this standalone port for gfortran 4.7: > > https://bitbucket.org/seanfarley/scienceports/src/tip/lang/gfortran/Portfile?at=default > > The reason I wrote this was to solve the "I need a fortran compiler > only" that some ports have. Historically, g95 has not been a good > solution for this due to its own problems, but none the less, I wrote > a port group for adding fortran compilers that adds both g95 and > gfortran. > > A few questions I had, > > 1) Is it ok to host the binary at bitbucket? > > 2) What would be the preferred way to set an optional dependence on > fortran? Currently, I use a variable "fortran.optional=yes" but could > switch it to a … proc (a la just like the github portgroup)? Something > else? > > Thanks in advance for any comments!
Is this really necessary considering that binary builds should already be available for the current gcc47 package? > _______________________________________________ > macports-dev mailing list > macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev