On 2013-01-23 01:30, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > I sometime disable a port in tree and reindex, the natural way to do > it is to prepend a dot to the portdir name. Is there anything against > the following? > > Index: src/macports1.0/macports.tcl > =================================================================== > --- src/macports1.0/macports.tcl (revision 101957) > +++ src/macports1.0/macports.tcl (working copy) > @@ -1689,6 +1689,7 @@ > foreach port [lsort -increasing -unique [readdir > $pathToCategory]] { > set pathToPort [file join $pathToCategory $port] > if {[file isdirectory $pathToPort] && > + [string index [file tail $pathToPort] 0] != "." && > [file exists [file join $pathToPort "Portfile"]]} { > # Call the function. > $func [file join $category $port] >
+0 Nothing against this. Note that we are already skipping paths beginning with an underscore in the category directory (to support _resources). The underscore was chosen as path names starting with a dot would not be displayed in Finder and the directory should still be accessible this way. While I use the shell for management of my port directory anyway, would there be a preference by others to use an underscore instead (or in addition) to the proposed dot? port lint should be extended to warn if a port name/port directory starts with a dot/underscore. Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev