> On 11 juil. 2013, at 15:51, Michael Dickens <michae...@macports.org> wrote:
> I haven't tried the 5.1 series > yet, I will have a look while I am on holiday later this month, but I cannot endorse the charge of being THE maintainer of qt5, even if I succeed: I would place the port under the ‘openmaintainer’ regime. > MacPorts is a great piece of software, and many of its developers are already > remunerated for (at least part of) > the work they do (e.g., by the company they work for; by some outside > contract -- either of which has an interest in some specific ports). Well, that’s somewhat a surprise to me. I do it for fun and the personal pleasure of being somehow helpful to a large number of people throughout the world. But I can easily imagine that keeping up with qt is such a pain that it is well worth some form of reward. Cheers! Vincent _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
