Well, 

maybe I am supposed to proved the patch files in some different format (one 
patch per file???) but the following seems to work fine for me (see below!). 
Anyway, if you wish me to provide some different patch, just let me know again! 
I can also provide the files themselves (the are actually quite some, patch in 
files is actually smaller the its patch ;-) )

Just let me know and thanks again!
~petr


--- snip ---

[radegast:~/sandbox/tmp/py-obspy] petr% ls -laR
total 4
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 23 20:01 .
drwxr-xr-x  3 petr  staff   102 Jul 23 19:53 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 petr  staff  3126 Jul 18 13:22 patch.py-obspy.diff
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 15 18:02 py-obspy

./py-obspy:
total 4
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 15 18:02 .
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 23 20:01 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 petr  staff  3003 Jul 15 18:02 Portfile
drwxr-xr-x  3 petr  staff   102 Jul 15 18:02 files

./py-obspy/files:
total 4
drwxr-xr-x  3 petr  staff  102 Jul 15 18:02 .
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff  136 Jul 15 18:02 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 petr  staff  990 Jul 15 18:02 patch-setup.py.diff
[radegast:~/sandbox/tmp/py-obspy] petr% patch -p3 < patch.py-obspy.diff 
patching file py-obspy/Portfile
patching file py-obspy/files/patch-setup.py.diff
[radegast:~/sandbox/tmp/py-obspy] petr% ls -laR
total 4
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 23 20:01 .
drwxr-xr-x  3 petr  staff   102 Jul 23 19:53 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 petr  staff  3126 Jul 18 13:22 patch.py-obspy.diff
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 23 20:02 py-obspy

./py-obspy:
total 4
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 23 20:02 .
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 23 20:01 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 petr  staff  2981 Jul 23 20:02 Portfile
drwxr-xr-x  3 petr  staff   102 Jul 23 20:02 files

./py-obspy/files:
total 4
drwxr-xr-x  3 petr  staff   102 Jul 23 20:02 .
drwxr-xr-x  4 petr  staff   136 Jul 23 20:02 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 petr  staff  1406 Jul 23 20:02 patch-setup.py.diff




On Jul 23, 2013, at 24:37 , Frank Schima <macsforever2...@macports.org> wrote:

> Maybe I was doing it wrong, but I was not able to get the patch to apply. 
> 
> 
> On Jul 22, 2013, at 4:03 AM, Peter Danecek <peter.dane...@bo.ingv.it> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi committers,
>> 
>> could anyone of you commit the patch attacked to ticket #39795. This should 
>> solve some important issues with the port (py-obspy). 
>> 
>> If you think it would be useful to track the issues regarding Python 2.6, I 
>> can file a separate ticket on this.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance!
>> ~petr
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> macports-dev mailing list
>> macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to