On Aug 15, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> wrote:
>> Revision: 109460
>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/109460
>> Author: landonf at macports.org
>> Date: 2013-08-15 15:01:38 -0700 (Thu, 15 Aug 2013)
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> Enable 10.5 as a minimum target version
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>> trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 21:57:55 UTC (rev
>> 109459)
>> +++ trunk/dports/security/certsync/Portfile 2013-08-15 22:01:38 UTC (rev
>> 109460)
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>> build {
>> system -W ${worksrcpath} "${configure.objc} \
>> ${configure.objcflags} \
>> - -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 \
>> + -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 \
>
> Shouldn't this be using $macosx_deployment_target?
>
> And presumably this means that the code doesn't work on 10.4, so other
> ports shouldn't depend on certsync on 10.4?
do we care about 10.4 (I don't think we should). The only reason why it's a
little bit reasonable to care about 10.5 is that it's the last release that
runs on ppc machines.
In both cases, Apple isn't releasing updates for them anymore...
--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dl...@geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
| Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
| reflect the opinions of my employer. |
+========================================================+
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
