On Aug 25, 2013, at 04:50, Clemens Lang wrote: > can somebody with more insight into the binary archives shed light on > what will happen if I epoch-bump a number of ports, but neither change > version nor revision? Will users end up downloading an old copy of the > port from packages.macports.org in that case? It seems to me the epoch > isn't encoded in the filename for our binary archives (see libedit[1] as > an example).
Yes, that's what I would expect to happen. > The background here is that all haskell packages need to be rebuilt > whenever GHC is updated. Can I avoid touching each port by adding an > epoch line to the Haskell PortGroup? I suppose that might not be enough, > because portindex wouldn't reindex the changed ports then, right? What's > the best way to overcome this situation? Revbump each portfile individually. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
