On Nov 1, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2013, at 14:44, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> On Nov 1, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> The solution would be for ports that use the ImageMagick libraries to 
>>> depend on it via depends_lib and for those only needing its programs to 
>>> depend on it via depends_build and/or depends_run.
>> 
>> I don't think you can say depends_run means 'only depends on programs' 
>> unless we specifically define it to mean that (I can think of a case where 
>> something doesn't link with a library or plugin, but loads it at runtime).
> 
> I didn’t say that. I said perhaps we should make “depends_lib” mean that it 
> depends on (i.e. links with) a library. That doesn’t seem so unreasonable.

the quoted sentence indicates:

1. depends_lib == linked to it (needs revbump)
2. depends_build/depends_run == only needs its programs.

I'm saying that unless we define depends_build/depends_run as only pertaining 
to programs, that 2 isn't necessarily true (an application can have a runtime 
dependency on a library or plugin that it loads at runtime but isn't linked 
with).

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                  
 
+========================================================+                      
  
| *---------------- dl...@geeklair.net ----------------* |                      
    
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                      
    
+========================================================+                      
  
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                      
    
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                      
    
+========================================================+



_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to