On Dec 13, 2013, at 16:49, s...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 114687
> Author
> s...@macports.org
> Date
> 2013-12-13 14:49:52 -0800 (Fri, 13 Dec 2013)
> Log Message
>
> github-1.0: use worksrpath variable when renaming folder; fixes #41797
> Modified Paths
>
> • trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/github-1.0.tcl
> Diff
>
> Modified: trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/github-1.0.tcl (114686 =>
> 114687)
>
> --- trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/github-1.0.tcl 2013-12-13
> 22:30:27 UTC (rev 114686)
> +++ trunk/dports/_resources/port1.0/group/github-1.0.tcl 2013-12-13
> 22:49:52 UTC (rev 114687)
>
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
>
> [llength [glob -nocomplain ${workpath}/*]] > 0} {
>
> if {[file exists [glob
> ${workpath}/${github.author}-${github.project}-*]] && \
>
> [file isdirectory [glob
> ${workpath}/${github.author}-${github.project}-*]]} {
>
> - move [glob ${workpath}/${github.author}-${github.project}-*]
> ${workpath}/${name}-${version}
>
> + move [glob ${workpath}/${github.author}-${github.project}-*]
> ${worksrcpath}
I had mentioned on the mailing list that it would be nice to *not* use
worksrcpath here, so that we could finally fix the bug which prevented ports
using the github portgroup from being able to use the worksrcpath variable
effectively.
https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2013-December/025456.html
I had suggested using “${distname}” instead. Markus went with
"${workpath}/${name}-${version}”; I’m not sure why.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
