On 12/30/13 12:39 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 00:21, David Evans <dev...@macports.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/29/13 11:48 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>>> I strongly suggest either reverting this or fixing openjade to build with 
>>> clang.  As it is, this blocks a decent number of ports from building on 
>>> Mavericks =(.
>>>
>>> --Jeremy
>>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2013, at 12:34, dev...@macports.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> The build of gtk-doc was successful on the Mavericks buildbot after this
>> change. It was able to successfully activate a previously built openjade.
> Oh, I see the problem.  I had an opensp which was built with clang and thus 
> using libc++ before it was blacklisted (without a revbump).  Thus I have a 
> *correct* opensp on my system which causes openjade to fail to link.  The 
> builders have a bad version of opensp which allowed a bad version of openjade 
> to build.
>
> I've addressed this by un-blacklisting clang in opensp and revbumping to 
> force everyone to rebuild and aborting in openjade until the blocking issue 
> (not building with clang) is addressed.
>
> --Jeremy
>
Ok, have removed the openjade dependency from gtk-doc in r115257.  Also
rev bumped openjade in r115255 to override the improperly built archive
on Mavericks.

Dave

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to