On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:27, Eric Gallager wrote: > > > I am still on 10.6 and still use the `+carbon` variant for > py-wxpython-2.8… > > Yes but would it be a problem for you to use the +gtk variant instead? If > so please explain. > > Oops, forgot to make sure that my previous response to this made it back to the lists: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Eric Gallager <eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu> Date: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:51 AM Subject: Re: Any objections to removal of the carbon variant in py-wxpython-2.8? To: Jeremy Lavergne <jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org> Cc: Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org> No, just that I prefer it and currently use it... I could probably do without it though. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Jeremy Lavergne < jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org> wrote: > Eric: do you mean you need +carbon? > Mojca: Is it possible to simply restrict all these things to a 10.6-only > block in the Portfile? > > On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:27, Eric Gallager <eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote: > > > The kind of complications I'm talking about is that a port like > > py-robotframework-ride would need to explicitly support three > > different variants (wxwidgets30, wxwidgets28, wxgtk28), set > > "supported_archs i386 ppc" with wxwidgets28, refuse to compile with > > Xcode 4.4 and later, make sure that the right variant is active > > (require_active_variants port:py${python.version}-wxpython-2.8 carbon > gtk) > > and be executed with 'arch -i386 <binary_name>'. Without all that the > > building on the buildbot fails. > >
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev