It is syntactically acceptable to not list a license version, but that means that any license version is acceptable. The LICENSE file in the impacket 0.9.11 tarball described the Apache license version 1.1 so I assumed that was the version it's actually licensed under.
The only list of licenses I know of is in the port_binary_distributable.tcl script but it doesn't include license version numbers. On Jul 14, 2014, at 3:44 AM, Aljaž @ HackerSpace_GO <g...@macports.org> wrote: > Ah, thanks. I wasn't sure about the version number, but the portfile passed > lint --nitpick, so I guessed it was ok. > > Do we have a list with all "supported" licenses? > > Aljaž Srebrnič > > Sent from mobile > -- -- > My public key: http://bit.ly/81qoyC > > On 14/lug/2014, at 10:34, ryandes...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision >> 122078 >> Author >> ryandes...@macports.org >> Date >> 2014-07-14 01:34:57 -0700 (Mon, 14 Jul 2014) >> Log Message >> >> impacket: add Apache license version number >> Modified Paths >> >> • trunk/dports/net/impacket/Portfile >> Diff >> >> Modified: trunk/dports/net/impacket/Portfile (122077 => 122078) >> >> >> --- trunk/dports/net/impacket/Portfile 2014-07-14 08:30:09 UTC (rev >> 122077) >> +++ trunk/dports/net/impacket/Portfile 2014-07-14 08:34:57 UTC (rev >> 122078) >> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ >> it simple to work with deep protocol hierarchies. >> >> platforms darwin >> -license Apache >> +license Apache-1.1 >> >> homepage >> http://corelabs.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=Wiki&action=view&type=tool&name=Impacket _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
