On 05/09/2014, at 9:59 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On Sep 4, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Eric Gallager <eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote: > >> Does it have to parallel "selfupdate"? "diagnose" works perfectly well >> by itself without the "self" in front of it... > > Of course it doesn't *have* to. But most of the port(1) verbs operate on > ports and port names, whereas "selfupdate" operates on the MacPorts > installation itself. So it would make sense to have a "selfcheck" that checks > on the MacPorts environment itself, as a whole.
So why not "checkself"? Cheers, Ian W. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
