On Oct 1, 2014, at 1:10 PM, Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 5:22 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > >> The problem with dots in port names is that so far "port lint" has declared >> the dot an illegal character in a variant name. This has led the perl5 port >> for example to adopt variant names like perl5_16 which I've always found a >> little confusing. It has been nice that under the original naming scheme, >> one could assume that in many cases the variant name matches the name of the >> dependency that will be added. If you want to use the python27 port, you use >> a port's +python27 variant, etc. >> >> Leaving the dot in would remove the ambiguity, as demonstrated by the Perl >> ports, and "port lint" may be overly cautious in its prohibition of the dot >> in variant names. Someone should do some tests. Make variants with dots, >> like "mysql5.1", and see if they work correctly. Can you install the port? >> Can you upgrade the port? Can you uninstall the port? What if other variants >> are also selected? If everything works fine we can relax this lint >> restriction. > > A cursory glance at port.tcl suggests that periods are acceptable in variant > names. > > http://trac.macports.org/browser/tags/release_2_3_1/base/src/port/port.tcl#L287 Lint warnings aside, after adding a mariadb10.0 variant to sphinx I have been able to install, activate and deactivate sphinx with an assortment of variants including mariadb10.0. Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
