> On Oct 25, 2014, at 7:23 AM, Mark Evenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is addressed with [r127181][] in a slightly kludgy way that will break > when more incompatible variants are introduced without adjusting the > conditional clause, as I couldn’t easily figure out how to code walk the > variants' declarations of conflicts easily.
It may be kind of awkward, but it's the standard way we handle this situation. vq Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
