On Sunday February 08 2015 22:09:29 VideoLAN's Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > Moreover, you called me and insulted me personally on a public mailing-list.
No. I don't know if Jeremy called you (I doubt he'd waste money on an international call to a cell) but I certainly didn't. And no one insulted you personally on this ML. Things were said about you that weren't meant to be nice, but they were not addressed to you. Either you went to the archives to (pardon the expression) "get yourself insulted", or someone on this list forwarded you a copy without telling anyone else but that's a hypothesis I am not going to give any credibility until that someone comes forward. > But, I'll forward it to the right people too. Sure, that's a very adult reaction, but I'm sure you weren't going to do that behind our backs, and CC us, right? > No wonder everyone moved to HomeBrew. > Please, go away. > It's weird, because Diego told me you were decent. No comments. > > "Also, the order in which libraries are linked is irrelevant." > > Where have I said that? That is flat out not true. The order in which > libraries are linked is relevant. Jeremy, that's me he's talking about (as well as the patches). He forgets to mentioned that I admitted to having been confused later in the thread (but I continue to think that the order in which you list libraries on the linker command line is irrelevant most of the time; I'm old enough to remember when that was not the case, and that I never have to give that order any thought anymore when not doing weird things like linking 2 competing OpenGL libraries). > int is perfectly fine for earlier versions of C. Again, that was about my code, Jeremy. I don't know why you felt the need to react to this kind of comment, but thank you (I guess) for confirming something never felt the need to call into question ;) R. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
